Buttigieg’s brother-in-law: ‘Whatever Pete is pushing’ is ‘anti-God’

Buttigieg’s brother-in-law: ‘Whatever Pete is pushing’ is ‘anti-God’

Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg‘s brother-in-law, Pastor Rhyan Glezman, knocked the Democratic hopeful for his remarks Tuesday night, when the candidate claimed he does not see “any compatibility” in between supporting President Trump and the teachings in Bible after declaring that God “does not belong to a political party.”

” Yeah, in the height of intellectual dishonesty for Pete to make claims that there’s no compatibility with being a Christian and ballot for Trump, [when] Pete, in fact, is the one who is pushing agendas and rhetoric that is against, clearly versus Bible,” Glezman stated on “ Tucker Carlson Tonight” on Wednesday.

BUTTIGIEG REPORTEDLY TOUTED ‘COLLABORATIONS’ WITH BLACK-OWNED SOUTH CAROLINA BUSINESSES THEY DENIED HAVING

” Simply whatever that Pete is pushing is, it’s anti-God. I’m simply gon na be honest with you,” Glezman said. “Nothing lines up with Bible for him to make cases like to say that you can not be a Christian and elect Trump. He’s the one that is openly contradicting God’s word over and over.”

” Do you think that it’s impossible to be a Christian and support Trump?” CNN host Erin Burnett had actually asked Buttigieg throughout a city center

” I’m not going to inform other Christians how to be Christian,” Buttigieg stated, “however I will say I can not discover any compatibility between the way this president conducts himself and anything I find in Scripture.”

Glezman also responded to a clip of Buttigieg on “The View” dealing with partial-birth abortion, in which co-host Meghan McCain asked the candidate about the subject, stating Democrats– consisting of pro-life Democrats– wish to know where his “line is.”

” But my point is that it should not be up to a federal government official to fix a limit,” Buttigieg said on the segment. “It must be up to the female who’s faced.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

” I’m just in a state of lament when you hear that we have someone running for leader in chief who can’t make an ethical choice on whether to keep a kid after it’s currently been born or to have it eliminated,” Glezman informed Tucker on Wednesday. ” What sort of ethical suggestions is he going to be provided if he can’t pertain to an understanding of that? It’s just, it’s disconcerting.”

Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.

Read More